November 2011

U.S. Chamber ignores asbestos deaths

This week’s National Law Journal published a letter I submitted in response to a tone-deaf op-ed from the U.S. Chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform. 

As is par for the course, the Chamber makes their usual baseless claims on behalf of asbestos manufacturers and their corporate donors.  More importantly, it did not make one single mention of the tens of thousands of Americans that have died from asbestos exposure.  As I wrote in the letter:     

Civil Justice System Forces Accountability after Medical Error

Richard Smith, an active retired PE teacher, was admitted to the North Shore Medical Center’s ICU for shortness of breath after receiving routine kidney dialysis.  The next day, Richard was alert and stable, but complained of an upset stomach and his doctor prescribed an antacid.  But Richard’s nurse disregarded nearly every single protocol in place to ensure safe drug administration and instead gave him a paralytic drug – pancuronium – that was inappropriately stored in the nursing area.  This negligence sent Richard into cardiac arrest, and although he was revived, he remained in a vegetative state and died a month later. 

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

 

Playing with Safety

Yesterday the USA Today featured a story on the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s (CPSC) annual toy safety report and the continued risks toys can pose for young children:

There were 34 toy recalls in the 2011 fiscal year, ended Sept. 30, down from 172 in 2008.

Still, a Consumer Product Safety Commission report out today shows toy-related deaths of kids younger than 15 increased last year, and injuries remain alarmingly high, says CPSC Chairman Inez Tenenbaum.

Seventeen child fatalities last year were toy-related, up from 12 in 2010. Almost half were from choking on balloons and balls — products so common they're hard to regulate.

Congress to examine civil justice issues this week

The U.S. House and Senate will examine a number of civil justice issues in committee hearings and bill markups this week.

This afternoon, the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law will take up the issue of foreign judgments. The hearing will address the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments by U.S. courts, but will unlikely address an even greater issue: the lack of accountability foreign manufacturers face when their negligence harms Americans here in the U.S.

This legal discrepancy between foreign and U.S. manufacturers gained national attention after Chinese drywall left American homeowners with millions of dollars in property damage and numerous health problems. Current law requires foreign manufactures to be brought to court in their home country and under their rules of service.

SCOTUS hears arguments in preemption case

On Wednesday the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products, a case which will test a railroad worker’s rights to hold a railroad manufacturer responsible for contracting mesothelioma, a disease caused by asbestos exposure.

The case is filed on behalf of a deceased railroad worker, George Corson, and his widow, Frieda Corson, and daughter, Gloria Kurns against Railroad Friction Products.  For over 25 years, Corson worked maintaining locomotives, including replacing brake shoes that contained asbestos.  Railroad Friction Products manufactured the brake shoes and failed to provide specific product warnings which are required under state law.  
 
The question the Court will address is whether federal railroad safety regulations permit lawsuits under state laws for injuries. 

U.S. Chamber's ILR Hypocritical Board Members

The U.S. Chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) has the sole mission of restricting the ability of individuals harmed by negligent corporations to access the civil justice system.  One ILR board member, Johnson & Johnson, has not only plowed money into this cause, but also has a sordid legal history that underscores the hypocrisy of ILR and its corporate financers.

In 2007, Johnson & Johnson filed their own lawsuit against the American Red Cross for using the red cross symbol on first aid kits and other disaster-preparedness items create by the Red Cross.  That same year Johnson & Johnson filed a patent lawsuit against fellow ILR board member Abbott Laboratories over the arthritis drug Humira.  Johnson & Johnson’s love for lawsuits continued when they file another patent lawsuit against Boston Scientific in 2010 for a dispute over heart stent devices.     
 
Johnson & Johnson is not alone in their hypocritical actions to deny Americans’ access to justice while at the same time using the courts to advance their bottom line.  AAJ’s newest report, Do As I Say, Not As I Sue, exposes ten ILR board members who claim American businesses are hindered by too many lawsuits, but show no hesitation in liberally using the courts to help themselves. 
 
Read more about the U.S. Chamber’s ILR and download the report at www.justice.org/USChamber